"基督宗教与公共价值"学术研讨会综述

2007年12月14日至16日,由中国社会科学院基督教研究中心主办,加拿火维真学院、香港中文大学崇基学院神学院、香港中文大学天主教研究中心、香港浸会大学中华基督宗教研究中心、香港汉语基督教文化研究所,以及德国汉堡NMZ等赞助合办的"基督宗教与公共价值"学术研讨会在北京江西大酒店召开.来自全国各高校、科研机构以及海外的近180位专家学者参加或旁听了此次研讨会.会议共收到学者们提交的学术论文60余篇,50多位学者作了大会发言.     

"基督宗教与社会转型"学术研讨会综述

2008年12月11日至13日,"基督宗教与社会转型"学术研讨会在北京召开.此次会议主办方为中国社会科学院基督教研究中心,合办单位包括:加拿大维真学院、香港中文大学崇基学院神学院、香港中文大学天主教研究中心、香港浸会大学中华基督宗教研究中心、基督教与中国研究中心(洛杉矶)以及香港汉语基督教文化研究所.     

交锋交流交融——"科学发展观与环境哲学"全国学术研讨会暨2009年中国环境哲学年会会议综述

2009年10月16日至19日,由中国自然辩证法研究会环境哲学 专业委员会、中国环境伦理学研究会共同主办,南京师范大学公共管理学院承办的"科学发展观与环境哲学"全国学术研讨会暨2009年中国环境哲学年会在南京师范大学隆重召开.来自全国各地的一百多名专家学者参加了会议,提交会议论文七十多篇,先后有三十余人作了大会发言.大会围绕着"科学发展观与环境哲学"这一主题,在思想的交锋、观点的碰撞、理论的融合中进行了广泛而深入的研讨.     

第二届"宗教对话与和谐社会"学术研讨会综述

2009年6月11～13日,第二届"宗教对话与和谐社会"学术研讨会在兰州大学召开.本次会议由兰州大学主办、兰州大学哲学社会学院与筹建中的宗教文化研究中心承办、香港文化更新研究中心协办.来自香港文化更新研究中心、香港中文大学、香港浸会大学、香港汉语基督教文化研究所、中国社会科学院、北京大学、华东师范大学、四川大学、南京大学、山东大学、陕西师范大学、兰州大学等全国各地的40多个哲学、宗教学研究学术单位的80余位专家学者及嘉宾参加了本次会议,会议从提交的近百篇     

"基督宗教与和谐社会"学术研讨会综述

2006年12月15日至17日,由中国社会科学院基督教研究中心主办的“基督宗教与和谐社会”学术研讨会在北京帝景豪廷酒店隆重召开。来自全国各地的100余名专家学者参加了此次研讨会,并有50多位学者在会上发言。中国社会科学院基督教研究中心主任、世界宗教研究所所长卓新平博士在开幕式上致欢迎辞。他指出,此次会议是基督教研究中心组织的中国基督宗教研究第十次大会,因而具有独特的意义;而之所以以“基督宗教与和谐社会”为会议主题则说明“我们的学术研究积极参     

"基督宗教社会学说及社会责任" 国际学术研讨会综述

2005年10月15日至18日,由中国社会科学院基督教研究中心和德国米苏尔社会发展基金会共同主办的“基督宗教社会学说及社会责任”国际学术研讨会在北京温特莱酒店召开。会议期间,共约50位中外学者参加了此次研讨会,其中35位学者提交了会议论文并做了大会发言。中国社会科学院基督     

第七次中国逻辑大会综述

"第七次中国逻辑大会"于2004年4月26～29日在北京召开,全国逻辑学界150余位代表出席了会议.本次大会由中国逻辑学会和中山大学逻辑与认知研究所共同主办,由中国逻辑与语言函授大学、西南师范大学、南京大学现代逻辑与逻辑应用研究所、浙江大学哲学系、华南师范大学政法学院、北京大学哲学系、中国政法大学逻辑研究所协办.大会议程分学术交流、颁发中国逻辑学会第一届优秀成果奖以及理事会换届三部分.     

“中国基督教神学思想建设十周年纪念大会”暨“神学思想建设与讲台信息”研讨会在南京召开

中国基督教两会于2008年11月11日至13日,在南京举行"中国基督教神学思想建设十周年纪念大会"暨"神学思想建设与讲台信息"研讨会。中国基督教两会全体委员、特邀嘉宾共200多人出席了会议。丁光训主教亲临会场并发表讲话。     

第六届全国美学大会暨"全球化与中国美学"学术研讨会综述

中华美学学会第六届全国美学大会暨"全球化与中国美学"学术研讨会于2004年6月25～27日在吉林省长春市举行,本次会议由中华美学学会、吉林大学文学院和中国文化研究所联合举办.与会代表围绕主题从多个方面展开如下探讨.     

国内新闻

佛教与基督教对话国际学术研讨会召开“佛教与基督教对话国际学术研讨会”于去年底在陕西师范大学、西安外事学院隆重召开。“佛教与基督教对话”是学术界普遍关注的热点问题。本届会议由清华大学道德与宗教研究中心、香港中文大学宗教系、陕西师范大学佛教研究所、西安外事学院宗教研究所联合举办,参加的学者分别来自美国、挪威、泰国、韩国,以及大陆内地、香港、台湾地区的著名高等学府或研究机构。大会收到论文33篇,约50万字。会议期间,代表们就相关问题进行了广泛而深入的讨论。基督教全国两会召开学习《前事不忘后事之师》会议1月5日,…     

"Psychotherapy" versus "treatment"

Presents a comment on "Psychological treatments" by D. H. Barlow. Barlow proposed that we distinguish between the terms "treatment" and "psychotherapy." The author believes that not only is the distinction unnecessary, but that its implications could have negative consequences for the field of clinical psychology. It is the proposed distinguishing feature that treatments are "specifically tailored to the pathological process that is causing the impairment and distress" that is most problematic. Clinical psychology does not need a distinction that further exacerbates the split between researchers and practitioners.     

"Enmeshment" and "Fusion"

The paper examines two related concepts utilized by two different schools of family therapy. Any family seen to be "enmeshed" is also seen as "fused," and vice versa. The difference in the level of focus, on the "system containing the individuals" (structural) or the "individual in the system" (fusion), determines the difference in therapeutic approach of these two schools.     

"本体论"与"伦理学"--形而上学的两个向度

形而上学有两个密切相关的内在向度,就是本体论向度与伦理学向度.在哲学史上,哲学家们之所以在"追求形而上学"的同时,又总是"反形而上学",并非是人们的形上本性出了问题,而是因为人们总是将形而上学视为单纯的"一维性",总是用一个向度来取代或遮蔽另一个向度.而所谓的"后形而上学思想",也并不是消解了形而上学,而是指形而上学从"本体论向度"转向了"伦理学向度".     

“对的”与“好的”

什么是“对的”,和对它的证立,是道德哲学中具有争议性的核心问题,也是效用主义和道义论间的主要差异之所在。统合效用主义对于“好的就是对的”这个陈述有一套完整周延的说法。而道义论对这个问题的证立不够周延或没有足够的说服力。     

PREFERRING "HOUSEWIVES" TO "FEMINISTS"

Four studies are described outlining the favorability of attitudes toward women. In Study 1, participants indicated their attitudes toward women and men and their construal of the term "women". The results revealed that women were evaluated more favorably than men, but that male right-wing authoritarians (RWAs) who construed women as referring primarily to feminists were least favorable in their attitudes. In Study 2, participants indicated their attitudes toward both "housewives" and "feminists". The results revealed that feminists were evaluated less favorably than housewives, and that the most negative attitudes toward feminists were expressed by authoritarian men. Study 3 revealed that high-RWA males held more negative symbolic beliefs concerning feminists (i.e., beliefs that feminists failed to promote participants'values) and that these beliefs accounted for variation in attitudes among high RWAs and much of the RWA-attitude relation. Finally, Study 4 revealed that high RWAs perceived greater value dissimilarity between them-selves and feminists. The implications of the findings for future research are discussed.     

"石狮"、"风水"与"吉祥"

谁都知道,在古老的中国,不管是衙门、宫殿、庙宇的门前,还是豪宅、大户人家的门口,人们都能看到摆着一对石狮。据说,这对石狮子在许多中国人的心目中,它不但是一种气派的象征,而且还是一种被人认为是好的“吉祥物”。如今,旧时的衙门没有了,但遗留下来的宫殿、庙宇的门前,其中有些石狮仍有保存。然而,想像不到的是,这号称“吉祥物”的石狮今天却开始“走”进某些党政机关的大门口,它们(石狮)在那里时时都在保护着这些政府要员“平平安安”、“吉祥如意”。这不仅使我联想起一些极端的报道,有些政府官员为升迁,请算命先生定位,用风水术为政府…     

"Us" and "Them":

Abstract: In the Aristotelian tradition, politics is a matter of public deliberation over questions of justice and injustice. The Bush administration's response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, has been uniformly hostile to this notion, and it has instead promoted a jingoistic politics of self‐assertion by an America largely identified with the executive branch of its government. This is doubly disturbing, as the executive branch has sought to free itself from international law, multinational commitments, and domestic judicial regulation, even as it has sought to validate itself by demonizing its enemies. This essay draws out the disturbing echoes here of Carl Schmitt's work of the 1920s, in particular of Schmitt's conception of the sovereign as the ungrounded ground of the law and the political as the site of mortal conflict between friend and enemy. The essay argues that Schmitt's position in the twenties, for all of its evident problems, is superior to that of Bush, Wolfowitz, and Ashcroft in at least two senses: Schmitt condemns the idea of waging war for profit and recognizes that such wars will often be disguised as moral crusades waged against the “inhuman”; and he acknowledges that claiming to fight a war for humanity denies one's enemies their humanity, leaving them open to torture and even extermination.     

从"管制"到"平衡"--政府与公众理想关系模式的构建及其制度化

论文从行政民主的角度探讨政府与公众之间的理想关系模式及其制度化构建过程 ,将我国在改革之前的政府与公众模式概括为管制模式。论文指出 ,在制度变迁的过程中 ,这一模式日益受到挑战。而在新的制度环境下 ,我国政府与公众的关系模式应该是平衡模式。这一模式的制度化措施包括培育自主的市民社会 ,赋予公众以独立的活动空间 ;促进行政公开 ,建立一个开放负责的政府 ;推进行政法建设 ,抑制行政恣意     

The "Natural" and the "Formal"

The paper presents an argument against a metaphysical conception of logic according to which logic spells out a specific kind of mathematical structure that is somehow inherently related to our factual reasoning. In contrast, it is argued that it is always an empirical question as to whether a given mathematical structure really does captures a principle of reasoning. (More generally, it is argued that it is not meaningful to replace an empirical investigation of a thing by an investigation of its a priori analyzable structure without paying due attention to the question of whether it really is the structure of the thing in question.) It is proposed to elucidate the situation by distinguishing two essentially different realms with which our reason must deal: the realm of the natural, constituted by the things of our empirical world, and the realm of the formal, constituted by the structures that we use as prisms to view, to make sense of, and to reconstruct the world. It is suggested that this vantage point may throw light on many foundational problems of logic.