加强小儿围术期疼痛管理——医学伦理的必然要求

近年小儿围术期疼痛管理日益引起人们的重视.小儿围术期疼痛管理包括围术期疼痛的监测和评估,疼痛治疗的原则和策略等方面的内容.鉴于儿童是一个相对独立的利益群体,即使新生儿在围术期也有完善的疼痛治疗的需求,重视小儿围术期的疼痛诉求,体现了对小儿的人文关怀和基本权力的维护,是医学伦理的必然要求.     

加强小儿围术期疼痛管理——医学伦理的必然要求

近年小儿围术期疼痛管理日益引起人们的重视。小儿围术期疼痛管理包括围术期疼痛的监测和评估,疼痛治疗的原则和策略等方面的内容。鉴于儿童是一个相对独立的利益群体,即使新生儿在围术期也有完善的疼痛治疗的需求,重视小儿围术期的疼痛诉求,体现了对小儿的人文关怀和基本权力的维护,是医学伦理的必然要求。     

癌症疼痛治疗中麻醉药品的应用现状及对策

麻醉药品在癌症疼痛治疗中发挥着日益重要的作用,包括我国在内的大多数发展中国家在应用麻醉药品控制癌症疼痛方面存在很多不足,与西方发达国家相比有一定差距.为早日实现"让中国癌症患者不痛"的目标,广大医务工作者应积极更新观念,掌握癌症疼痛的治疗原则与方法;积极倡导改善癌痛治疗不足的现状.同时加大宣传力度,取得患者家属和相关部门的理解、支持,努力保障癌痛病人获得止痛治疗的权利.     

儿童癌症疼痛相关问题探讨

几乎所有的癌症患儿在其病程中都会经历疼痛,其中70%以上患儿在某一时刻会有重度疼痛.目前儿童癌痛的有效控制率令人担忧.对于下面几个问题如果能够充分了解,将有助于患儿的疼痛控制.这些问题包括:疼痛控制力度不够的原因;疼痛产生原因;疼痛的评估方法;疼痛的药物治疗和非药物治疗原则.     

护士实施术后疼痛循证评估现状思考及策略

外科护士对术后患者伴有急性疼痛时,所采取的以证据为基础的术后疼痛评估和决策,关乎患者的术后恢复和疼痛管理整体质量.本文通过对外科护士的术后疼痛循证护理实践现状进行调查,分析不规范术后疼痛评估具体表现及弊端,从而进一步分析影响术后疼痛评估循证护理实践的障碍因素,并提出对应干预策略,旨在为有效术后疼痛管理提供依据.     

癌症疼痛治疗中麻醉药品的应用现状及对策

麻醉药品在癌症疼痛治疗中发挥着日益重要的作用,包括我国在内的大多数发展中国家在应用麻醉药品控制癌症疼痛方面存在很多不足,与西方发达国家相比有一定差距。为早日实现“让中国癌症患者不痛”的目标,广大医务工作者应积极更新观念,掌握癌症疼痛的治疗原则与方法;积极倡导改善癌痛治疗不足的现状。同时加大宣传力度,取得患者家属和相关部门的理解、支持,努力保障癌痛病人获得止痛治疗的权利。     

疼痛的心理学研究

心理学对疼痛的研究已经进行了几十年,成果颇丰。众多的研究已经证实了疼痛与基本心理过程之间的相互关系,包括注意、情绪、动机和记忆。除了基本心理过程外,社会因素也能够调节疼痛,如社会排斥、信仰、音乐、虚拟情境、金钱和权利等。已有疼痛研究中的疼痛测量方法过于主观,并且疼痛调节因素在临床中缺乏实践价值。当前疼痛研究呈现与具身思潮相结合的趋势,未来应更加重视发掘调节疼痛的社会因素。     

儿童癌症疼痛相关问题探讨

几乎所有的癌症患儿在其病程中都会经历疼痛,其中70％以上患儿在某一时刻会有重度疼痛。目前儿童癌痛的有效控制率令人担忧。对于下面几个问题如果能够充分了解,将有助于患儿的疼痛控制。这些问题包括：疼痛控制力度不够的原因;疼痛产生原因;疼痛的评估方法;疼痛的药物治疗和非药物治疗原则。     

癌症疼痛心理社会干预治疗的研究进展

癌症疼痛是一种复杂和多维的感受,与心理和社会因素相互影响。本文回顾近期国内外相关研究指出,许多重要的社会心理因素与疼痛有关,包括心理压力、应对方法、社会支持以及社会经济因素,它们是疼痛管理的难点。近期的国内外研究表明缓解癌痛的心理社会干预措施包括：疼痛教育、应对技能训练和催眠等,它们对疼痛治疗管理是有益的补充,同时抗抑郁药物应用对疼痛治疗有益。     

对麻醉药品的严格管理与癌症患者止痛的合理需求

药物止痛是治疗癌症疼痛的主要方法,而阿片类止痛药是治疗中、重度癌症疼痛的关键性用药.给癌症疼痛患者充分应用阿片类药物,并不意味着可以放松对此类药物的控制和管理,对麻醉药品进行严格管理可确保癌症疼痛患者合法、安全、合理用药.正确认识及合理使用麻醉药品是实现WHO提出"让癌症患者不痛"目标的重要保证.     

老年慢性疼痛患者疼痛接受与疼痛程度的相关关系

了解老年慢性疼痛患者疼痛接受与疼痛程度,探讨两者的相关关系.采用简易慢性疼痛接受问卷（CPAQ-8）中文版、简化McGill疼痛问卷（SF-MPQ）与一般情况调查表对335例老年疼痛患者进行调查.结果纳入有效样本308例,SF-MPQ总体平均分为（50.24±23.35）分,中文版CPAQ-8总体平均得分（21.74±5.97）分.老年慢性疼痛患者的受教育程度、疼痛期、疼痛部位及疼痛点数目等差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.疼痛接受与疼痛程度呈负相关（P＜0.01）,即接受程度越高者,其疼痛程度越低.     

The pain behavior scale: Modification and validation for outpatient use

The present study investigated the validity of an inpatient pain behavior rating scale modified for outpatient use. A series of 43 consecutive outpatients referred for evaluation of chronic pain was examined using the Pain Behavior Scale (PBS) and other psychometric instruments. Analyses revealed significantly higher Pain Behavior Scale scores for low back and multiple pain-site groups. The results also indicated a high degree of internal consistency of the scale. A multiple regression analysis, predicting observed pain behavior from reported pain behavior, indicated that decreased activity accounted for 32% of the variance in the PBS score. A similar regression for pain experience found that the pain level and the sensory scale score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire accounted for 39% of the PBS variance. Psychological characteristics including disease conviction, self-control, depression, and anxiety explained 45% of the variability in the PBS score. Thus, the scale is related to pain intensity, interference with activities, and a variety of psychological characteristics. The scale provides a measure of observable pain behavior that is also relatively independent of these clinical data sources. The Pain Behavior Scale as modified for outpatient use provides a brief index of pain behavior with potential use in the comprehensive evaluation of the pain patient.     

Psychosocial Subgroups, Coping, and Chronic Low-Back Pain

The purpose of this study was to compare psychosocial subgroups in terms of pain coping strategies, pain severity, physical impairment, pain behavior, affective distress, and response to pain management treatment. The Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) was used to classify 67 chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients into the following psychosocial subgroups: Dysfunctional, Interpersonally Distressed, Adaptive Coping, and Anomalous. These MPI subgroups were compared on the Pain Behavior Checklist, Behavioral Observation Measure of Pain Behavior, Revised Coping Strategies Questionnaire, and Chronic Disease Index. The Dysfunctional subgroup reported significantly more pain behavior, disability, affective distress, and catastrophizing than either the Interpersonally Distressed subgroup or Adaptive Copers, but were not significantly different on measures of adaptive coping strategies. The percentage of dropouts from treatment was significantly less among Adaptive Copers (11%) than among the Dysfunctional (33%) or Interpersonally Distressed (47%) subgroups. Differences in affective distress found among the MPI subgroups at baseline were not evident at the posttreatment assessment. The present findings support the use of MPI psychosocial subgroup analysis to enhance our understanding of differential response to chronic pain and pain management intervention.     

Pain: Biopsychosocial Mechanisms and Management

Traditionally, pain has been viewed as a sensory event warning of tissue damage or illness. This explanation fails to account for many of the experiences of people suffering from clinically painful conditions. Over the past two decades, a new biopsychosocial perspective on pain has emerged. This perspective emphasizes that pain is a dynamic process that not only is influenced by biological, psychological, and social mechanisms of pain, but also produces biological, psychological, and social changes that can affect future responses to pain. This review presents findings from recent studies of the biological, psychological, and social mechanisms of pain and discusses the implications of these findings for pain research, assessment, prevention, and treatment, as well as for health care policy.     

治疼必需知痛

疼痛是人体可感知所有伤害性刺激中最难以忍受的恶性刺激,医学范畴下的疼痛是指组织损伤的前提下产生的＂躯体的不愉快的疼感觉＂加上＂与之相匹配的痛苦情感体验＂两方面内容。长期以来我们的医疗行为＂过多关注组织损伤对疼的调控、忽视了痛苦体验的人文关怀＂制约了我们服务层次。新的生物医学模式下诊疗工作强调细化疼痛分类、躯体与心理并重,以专科诊疗思路指导临床,提高医务人员对病痛的理解、引导供需匹配式的人性医疗服务是时代发展务实之举。     

The relationship of depression and somatic focus to experimental and clinical pain in chronic pain patients

Abstract

The present study examined Fields' proposal that depression increases the sensory experience of pain in part through greater somatic focus. Experimental and clinical pain measures were compared to self-report of depression and somatic focus in 60 chronic pain patients. Depression scores were unrelated to pain threshold or tolerance on the cold-pressor test. However, as hypothesized by Fields, path analytic models suggested that depression had a direct influence on the evaluative and affective aspects of pain, but the relationship between depression and sensory pain was mediated by somatic focus. These results provide partial support for Fields' neurobiological model of pain and depression.     

疼痛恐惧的形成及其对疼痛知觉的影响

脑岛、杏仁核是疼痛恐惧形成的重要神经网络中心。疼痛恐惧增强了慢性疼痛患者的疼痛知觉体验, 进而加剧抑郁、焦虑情绪和功能损伤程度。脑岛、杏仁核、前额皮层和前扣带回是疼痛恐惧影响疼痛知觉的重要神经基础。通过认知方法干预疼痛恐惧可以改善患者的抑郁、焦虑情绪, 减少功能损伤。未来研究应拓展疼痛恐惧的测量工具, 采用功能磁共振成像技术进一步揭示疼痛恐惧影响慢性疼痛患者疼痛知觉的神经机制。     

疼痛表征在自我和他人间的一致性效应

在以往研究中“pain matrix”被认为是加工自我和他人疼痛信息的特异性神经机制, 也可能是个体对他人疼痛共情的原因。但是最近的研究发现非疼痛的感觉刺激也能激活该脑区, 因此疼痛表征在自我和他人间是否存在一致性受到质疑。研究采用启动范式从两个方面入手探索自身疼痛和疼痛共情间是否存在一致性关系。实验一使用疼痛和非疼痛图片为启动刺激, 疼痛或热刺激为靶刺激, 发现相对于非疼痛图片, 疼痛图片启动下被试对自身疼痛刺激的反应时减少, 疼痛水平和情绪反应增强。实验二使用疼痛和热刺激为启动刺激, 疼痛或非疼痛图片为靶刺激, 发现相对于热刺激, 疼痛刺激启动下被试对疼痛图片的反应时减少。同时, 在两个实验中非疼痛的靶刺激都不受启动刺激的影响。这说明疼痛表征在自我和他人间存在一致性效应。