陈衍"以诗存史"诗史观论析

陈衍"以诗存史"诗史观,重心在搜集有事之诗达到存史目的,这一诗学观既是对孟棨<本事诗>以来纪事诗话宗旨与元好问<中州集>以来"以诗存史"诗学观的传承与发扬,也是晚清国势衰微之际陈衍民族危机与世道关怀意识的投射.这是一种自觉的有着强烈现实主义精神的诗史观.     

早期阴阳家与"卦气"说考索

本文通过对帛书<要>、<管子·五行>、<史记·太史公自序>、<汉书·魏相传>及<汉书·艺文志>等文献资料的考索,初步梳理了早期阴阳家的源流和一些特点,发掘了其在象数易学史上的贡献.认为,早期阴阳家出于古代史官.在史官那里,已达到了象数易学阶段,他们已有了以卦与岁时相配的"卦气"说.早期阴阳家承其做法,以六卦与"五时"相配,纳入五行,而有富有特色的"古五子"的"卦气"说.文章指出,史官是<易>之"古义"的主要掌握者,后来早期阴阳家、道家、儒家等所传习的"卦气"说等象数"古义",当皆本之于他们.     

再论"五行"与"聖智"

思孟五行与乐有密切的关系.<史记·乐书>不仅保留了思孟五行,而且以汉代五行图式,凸显"聖"德的地位."聖"居中,含容"仁义礼智",君位,宫音,土德,具有包容、为主、统合、生生的意蕴.<荀子>、<中庸>,特别是<孟子>与<孟子字义疏证>中有不少关于"聪明聖智"与"天德之知"的材料.戴震的发挥,深得思孟五行的个中三昧.与"聪明"相联的"聖智"是一种"神明"、"天德",是对"天道"的体悟或神契,是体验、接近超越层的"天德之知".切不可从知识论的视域,特别是主客对待的认识论的角度去理解思孟五行.思孟五行是具有终极信仰的、以天道观为背景的"天人聖智五行观",蕴含着深刻的道德形上学的思想,其枢纽是"聖智".     

王弼"大衍义"略论

王弼易学的特点是以<老>解<易>,以他在<老子注>中所阐发的玄学本体论思想为基础来解释<周易>,这主要体现在他的<周易略例>当中.而他对"大衍之数"的解释,也使"大衍义"在其思想体系中占有重要地位.联系<周易略例>我们就能看出,"大衍义"是连接王弼玄学中老学和易学的桥梁,它体现了王弼玄学的体用观念,为王弼思想由老学向易学的过渡打下了基础.     

《太极图》与《太极图说》之"五行说"比较研究

本文旨在对<太极图>的作者问题提出个人的看法.首先,本文从比较<太极图>与<太极图说>对"五行"思想的不同表达入手,指出二者所论的"五行"思想分别属于不同的流传系统.其次,本文较深入的比较了这两种"五行"思想的异同之处,进而指出基于这一矛盾可以初步判断,<太极图>与<太极图说>决非一人所做.     

宋儒张载"以易为宗"思想探析

张载是宋代理学的奠基者,也是四大学派之一--关学的开创者.他的成就得到理学家们的肯定,如程颢、程颐将他与孟子、韩愈相比;朱熹于<伊洛渊源录>中,将其与周敦颐、邵雍、二程并列;<近思录>也选录许多张载言论,以为门生弟子进学之助.而后代统治阶层的重视,也可看出他的影响宋理宗封他为郿伯,从祀孔庙.元代赵复立周敦颐祠,以张载与程、朱配食.<宋史道学传>为他立传,颂扬他的德业.他的著作在明、清二代是开科取士的必读书目,并于清初编入御纂<性理大全>和<性理精义>中,可见张载在理学发展上的贡献与地位.     

儒学形而上系统的最初建构--《五行》所展示的儒学形而上体系

郭简<五行>篇具有重要的研究价值,本文主要对其对儒学形而上体系之建构作出理解和诠释,着重通过对<五行>篇的内在结构的分析,阐明<五行>所建立的儒学形而上体系的内部结构,说明和论证此体系正是儒学的"一以贯之"的内在结构和形而上体系,<五行>的思想是思孟之间一个不可或缺的重要的过渡环节,它继承孔子以来儒学的内在精神,使儒学的形而上体系得以明晰,并为孟子进一步继承和发展,从而推动了儒学的进一步发展.通过<五行>"形于内"和"不形于内"的分析,对天人合一也作出新的理解.     

《墨子》古本"目录"及佚篇考说

<隋书·经籍志>首次明确著录<墨子>书中有目录一卷,其后各种史志目录中均不见记载.<墨子>古本"目录"面貌如何,一直是墨学界聚讼不已、悬而未决的问题.笔者认为,<墨子>目录出现较晚,大约亡佚于隋末唐初之际.西汉末年刘向校定<墨子>成书后,所撰写叙录并未单独成篇.近人蒋维乔等学者的学术观点,<汉书·艺文志>所载"<墨子>七十一篇"包括目录一篇,是不成立的.本文从几个方面进行了论证分析.     

郭店楚简《五行》篇校释札记

本文以郭店楚简<五行>篇与帛书<五行>篇的<经>文和<说>文相互对勘,对其尚未解决的7个疑难问题进行了系统考释,得出了崭新的结论,对于读通简、帛<五行>篇,准确地把握其思想具有基础研究意义.     

帛书《缪和》、《昭力》"子曰"辨

本文认为帛书<缪和>、<昭力>之"子曰"即是"孔子曰",并非指"讲师之言".而谬和、昭力等七人,皆当为孔子晚年弟子,而非汉初人物.由此还认为,<缪和>、<昭力>乃是儒家研<易>著作,而战国至汉初流传的诸种<易传>皆当以孔子为宗主,且多与孔子晚年弟子及其后学相关.     

从心理学的角度看“法轮功”

“法轮功”痴迷者的痴迷在很大程度上是由于痴迷者们对自身的心理缺乏了解．从而被李洪志钻了空子,李洪志对人们日常生活中一些常见但又不为人们所注意的心理现象进行了别有用心的解释,从而达到其精神控制的目的。本文从心理学常识的视角对这些滥用心理技术的现象逐一进行了分析和揭露。     

A psychoanalytic view of the Rorschach Comprehensive System "special scores"

We analyzed the contemporary empirical and theoretical literature concerning the two predominant approaches for scoring formal thought disorder on the Rorschach, the Comprehensive System special scores, and the methodology of Rapaport, Gill, and Schafer (1946/1968). The psychoanalytic research related to selected special scores is reviewed, and some linkages to psychoanalytic developmental theory and psychopathology are made. Recommendations are presented to bridge the gap between these two important avenues of Rorschach research, with an emphasis on empirical rigor and intrapsychic contextual meaning.     

《列子》自然观初探

《列子》一书与《老子》、《庄子》并列为道家的三部经典。唐天宝元年 (74 2年 ) ,唐玄宗下旨置“玄学博士” ,并以四部道家著作作为必修的科目 ,士人习之可以应试科举。其中一部《冲虚真经》(宋朝时又加上“至德”二字 ,称为《冲虚至德真经》) ,便是称为列御寇所撰的《列子》。《列子》一书的真伪是我国学术史聚讼千载的一大公案。现在 ,它的伪书性质已成为学界公论 ,一般认为它主要成书于魏晋之际① 。《列子》的思想比较复杂 ,又因为它是伪书 ,所以一直没有受到学术界的足够重视 ② 。但《列子》一书有丰富的自然观的内容 ,代表着我国古…     

A "view from nowhen" on time perception experiments

Systematic errors in time reproduction tasks have been interpreted as a misperception of time and therefore seem to contradict basic assumptions of pacemaker-accumulator models. Here we propose an alternative explanation of this phenomenon based on methodological constraints regarding the direction of time, which cannot be manipulated in experimental settings. In two experiments, we demonstrate the influence of the direction of a dimensional change for pitch and brightness estimates. The results support the assumption that errors in time reproduction tasks do not reflect a systematic temporal misperception, but rather a methodological artifact. Implications for contemporary models of time perception are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).     

道教道性论浅议

隋唐时期,中国道教正式开始对得道成仙之依据等问题进行了深入探讨,从而提出了具有非常重要理论意义的“道性”论。“道性”论的提出,极大地推进了道教的学理化进程。它不仅对众生悟道成仙的理论根据进行了严密的论证,而且还大大简化了道教的修炼程序,把修道的重点安置在修己一     

论庄子“万物一齐”的生态审美观

当先秦诸子大都以人的理解为中心去看待人与自然万物的存在方式,认为万物只是相对于人来说才具有存在的价值和意义时,庄子站在古典存在论的立场上提出了含有生态审美智慧的“万物一齐”观,即“休乎天钧”的生态和谐理念、“为是不用而寓诸庸”的生态价值观念、“万物与我为一”的生态共生气象。其“万物一齐”的生态审美观所蕴涵的万物平等共生、放弃自我中心、无用之用等观念有助于当代的生态伦理和生态实践建设。     

The analyst's knowledge and authority: a critique of the "new view" in psychoanalysis

A critical assessment is presented of positions recently taken by Mitchell and Renik, who are taken as representatives of a "new view" in psychoanalysis. One article by Mitchell and two by Renik are examined as paradigmatic of certain ways of construing the nature of mind, the analyst's knowledge and authority, and the analytic process that are unduly influenced by the postmodern turn in psychoanalysis. Although "new view" theorists have made valid criticisms of traditional psychoanalytic theory and practice, they wind up taking untenable positions. Specifically called into question are their views on the relation between language and interpretation, on the one hand, and the mental contents of the patient on the other. A disjunction is noted between their discussion of clinical material and their conceptual stance, and their idiosyncratic redefinitions of truth and objectivity are criticized. Finally, a "humble realism" is suggested as the most appropriate philosophical position for psychoanalysts to adopt.     

Distractibility in dieters and nondieters: an alternative view of "externality"

Two experiments were performed in an investigation of the effects of distraction and emotional arousal on the proofreading performance of dieting female subjects. In Experiment 1, it was found that distraction initially impaired the performance of dieters and facilitated the performance of nondieters, a pattern previously shown by Rodin to apply to obese and normal weight subjects, respectively, and interpreted as evidence of greater externality in the obese. Subsequent retesting of the same subjects in succeeding months, however, revealed a complete reversal of the original results. In Experiment 2, the reaction to distraction found in the first phase of Experiment 1 was obtained when subjects were in a situation of minimal threat. In a situation of high threat, the relative distractibility of dieters was reversed, as in the latter phases of Experiment 1. An explanation is offered for these data in terms of the greater emotionality of dieters, the susceptibility of cognitive performance to arousal (distraction, anxiety) manipulations, and the potentially competing effects of distraction and anxiety. Implications for the prevailing "trait" view of externality (stimulus binding) are discussed.