Justifying My Position in Your Terms: Cross-cultural Argumentation in a Globalized World |
| |
Authors: | Yameng Liu |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of English, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, U.S.A.; E-mail |
| |
Abstract: | A community of minds has long been presumed to be a condition of possibility for genuine argumentative interactions. In part because of this disciplinary presupposition, argumentation scholars tend to exclude from their scope of inquiry conflict resolution among culturally heterogeneous and ideologically incompatible formations. Such a stance needs to be reexamined in view of recent developments in the on-going process of globalization. The unprecedented worldwide economic and financial integration has created for the first time a generalized interest across national and continental boundaries. The need to countercheck global market forces has given rise to calls for a global legal/ethical system or even a transnational public sphere. Non-Western interlocutors in general are willing to debate cross-cultural issues in Western terms. Increasingly, Western interlocutors are also seeking to justify Western positions in non-Western terms. This emerging situation renders it both necessary and possible to argue across the boundaries of communities that do not share the same cultural or rhetorical tradition. It also poses a host of theoretical and practical issues whose exploration and analysis should become a new focus of argumentation studies. |
| |
Keywords: | cross-cultural argumentation globalization incommensurability |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|