Offender interviewing in custodial settings: Understanding validity,value and veracity issues |
| |
Authors: | Friedo JW Herbig Cecili Doorewaard |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Criminology and Security Science, University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria, South Africaherbifjw@unisa.ac.za;3. Department of Criminology and Security Science, University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria, South Africa |
| |
Abstract: | The purpose of this scoping literature review was to identify trends regarding validity, value and veracity issues when conducting (qualitative) interviews with offenders in custodial settings. We selected for review works from electronic databases in SAGE, Springer, and Taylor and Francis by using e-journals, Google Scholar and the behavioural science database, PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria for our studies were based on whether sources addressed offender interviewing as a wellspring of information, but excluded those that focused solely on the acquisition of clinical information (at the expense of focusing on validity, value and veracity issues). We utilised the content analysis approach to identify themes/ patterns in the research findings. Key findings suggest that offenders with impression management motivations deceive and manipulate in their research interview presentations. When gathering data from inmates in custodial care settings, best practice includes cross-checking offender interview data against other sources of evidence and taking into account the context in which they are serving their sentences. |
| |
Keywords: | inmates posturing interviewing veracity deception custodial (care) settings prison |
|
|