A syntactical approach to modality |
| |
Authors: | Paul Schweizer |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, 2 Buccleuch Place, EH8 9LW Edinburgh, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | Conclusion The systems TN and TM show that necessity can be consistently construed as a predicate of syntactical objects, if the expressive/deductive power of the system is deliberately engineered to reflect the power of the original object language operator. The system TN relies on salient limitations on the expressive power of the language LN through the construction of a quotational hierarchy, while the system TMrelies on limiting the scope of the modal axioms schemas to the sublanguage LinfM+, which corresponds exactly with the restrictive hierarchy of LN. The fact that LinfM+ is identical to the image of the metalinguistic mapping C+ from the normal operator system into LM reveals that iterated operator modality is implicitly hierarchical, and that inconsistency is produced by applying the principles of the modal logic to formulas which have no natural analogues in the operator development. Thus the contradiction discovered by Montague can be diagnosed as the result of instantiating the axiom schemas with modally ungrounded formulas, and thereby adding radically new modal axioms to the predicate system.The predicate treatment of necessity differs significantly from that of the operator in that the cumulative models for the predicate system are strictly first-order. Possible worlds are not used as model-theoretic primitives, but rather alternate models are appealed to in order to specify the extension of N, which is semantically construed as a first-order predicate. In this manner, the intensional aspects of modality are built into the mode of specifying the particular set of objects which the denotation function assigns to N, rather than in the specification of the basic truth conditions for modal formulas. Intensional phenomena are thereby localised to the special requirements for determining the extension of a particular predicate, and this does not constitute a structural modification of the first-order models, but rather limits the relevant class of models to those which possess an appropriate denotation function. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|