灾区民众的公正观与幸福感及其与非灾区的比较

作为公德的社会公正与作为私情的个人幸福，是个体作为社会成员的两个方面，二者在逻辑上是统一的，以往的心理学研究也证实了这一点，但在低标准下，二者却可能出现分离。本研究探讨了灾区民众的公正观和幸福感及其与非灾区的对比，以及中国本土文化背景下二者的关系。本研究发现，与非灾区相比，处在灾区的民众持有更高的公正观与更平和的情感状态，男性尤其如此，并且其情感幸福对公正观有微弱的正向预测（主要是积极情感），但八个月后随着公正观与幸福感的回落，这种关联变得不显著。民众的情感幸福与公正观在常态下表现为分离的关系，但生活满意度这一幸福感的认知因素却与公正观一直有正向的关联。总之，情感幸福、认知幸福与社会认知的矛盾、变换关系，暗示了建立在私情基础之上的、在灾难中不断强化的中国人特定的情感与理性诉求。

Belief in A Just World and Subjective Well-Being: Comparing Disaster Sites with Normal Areas

Justice and happiness are two goals of individuals as public person and private person separately, which are consistent logically and have been confirmed by some psychological researches, but can be inconsistent in low standard. The present study investigated the general belief in a just world(GBJW) and subjective well-being of people in disaster sites and normal areas, and their correlates in Chinese indigenous background. The authors found that: 1) Comparing to normal areas, participants in disaster sites endorsed more GBJW and less negative affection, and there was interaction of region and gender. 2) Affective well-being (mainly positive affection) could predicted slightly GBJW in disaster sites, while it did not do in back-normal period and in normal areas. However, cognitive well-being (life satisfaction) could predicted GBJW in both conditions. In conclusion, the dialectical correlation of affective well-being, cognitive well-being and belief in a just world, implies the special model of affective expression and rational pursuit of Chinese who lives in the private relationship and much suffering world