| After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? |
| |
| 引用本文： | Hayward WG. After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition?[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2003, 7(10): 425-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.004 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | Hayward WG |
| |
| 摘 要： |
|
After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? |
| |
| Hayward William G. After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition?[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2003, 7(10): 425-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.004 |
| |
| Authors: | Hayward William G |
| |
| Affiliation: | Department of Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Shatin, NT, China. whayward@psy.cuhk.edu.hk |
| |
| Abstract: | A debate on whether object representations capture isolated viewpoints or ranges of views has dominated research in object recognition in recent years, but now seems to be waning. Rather than assume a narrow model in which either structural or view information is used to recognize an object, researchers have begun to examine how these properties might be used cooperatively. A recent paper by Foster and Gilson confirms sensitivity to both types of information, which combine in an additive framework to predict recognition performance. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录！ |
