实践的逻辑与哲学终结论的困境

以实践是一种具体、历史的现实生活为基础，把马克思意义上的哲学终结论解释为以具体、历史的分析取代抽象、超历史的形而上分析这种愈来愈被认可的说法，由于马克思仍然把需要、经济、理性、发展视为一般性、永恒性的东西，而需要重思。实际上，马克思在反旧形而上学之路上前进的距离不能过高估计。对实践的自悖性估计过低是马克思未能继续前进的根源。同时，在马克思主义理论中反对过分的专门化富有意义，但把哲学终结于社会批判理论中的马尔库塞式见解也会造成某种漠视。

The Logic of Practice and the Difficulties to End Philosophy

For the reason that practice is a concretely and historically actual life, it is gradually accepted by people to interpret Marx's theory about the end of philosophy as a theory of concrete and historical analysis instead of abstract and non - historical one. But as Marx treated need, economy, rationality , development as something eternal, such a theory needs a new reappraisal. In fact, the distance Marx led to oppose the old metaphysics should not be overestimated. And underestimating the pardox of practice may be the primary reason Marx can't further his theory. Besides, to end philosophy with the social critical theory in Marxism would cause some neglect, though in which the theory of opposing over - specialization is significant.