Individual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal |
| |
Authors: | Rebecca D. Ray Kevin N. Ochsner Jeffrey C. Cooper Elaine R. Robertson John D. E. Gabrieli James J. Gross |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N4;(2) Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University, 328 AD Building, 7141 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC, Canada, H4B 1R6;(3) Department of Medicine, Columbia University/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, 622 West 168th Street, PH9, New York, NY 10036, USA; |
| |
Abstract: | Cognitive reappraisal can alter emotional responses by changing one’s interpretation of a situation’s meaning. Functional neuroimaging has revealed that using cognitive reappraisal to increase or decrease affective responses involves left prefrontal activation and goal-appropriate increases or decreases in amygdala activation (Ochsner, Bunge, Gross, & Gabrieli, 2002; Ochsner, Ray, et al., 2004). The present study was designed to examine whether patterns of brain activation during reappraisal vary in relation to individual differences in trait rumination, which is the tendency to focus on negative aspects of one’s self or negative interpretations of one’s life. Individual differences in rumination correlated with increases in amygdala response when participants were increasing negative affect and with greater decreases in prefrontal regions implicated in self-focused thought when participants were decreasing negative affect. Thus, the propensity to ruminate may reflect altered recruitment of mechanisms that potentiate negative affect. These findings clarify relations between rumination and emotion regulation processes and may have important implications for mood and anxiety disorders. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|