Controlling the flight on double-handed foiling catamarans: The role of shared equipment on the crew members' mutual modes of regulation |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Nantes Université, Movement - Interactions – Performance, MIP, UR 4334, F-44000, Nantes, France;1. University of Birmingham, UK;2. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece;3. Canterbury Christ Church University, UK;4. California State University, Fresno, USA;5. Sapienza University of Rome, Italy;1. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada;2. University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia;3. Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, Canada;4. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA;5. Western University, London, Ontario, Canada;6. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom;1. Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;2. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia;3. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;1. Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, New Zealand;2. Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine Research Centre, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom |
| |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this study was to contribute to the understanding of the role of shared sport equipment in the collective coordination of a team. It was conducted within an enactive approach of human cognition by mobilizing the methodological tools and methods of the Course of Action framework. Six crew members of hydrofoil sailing catamarans participated in this study. Data collection consisted in video-recording training sessions followed by individual self-confrontation interviews. A qualitative analysis of the data allowed typical modes of regulation of the flight to be characterized from each crew member's perspective. Three main modes of regulation were identified. All of them involved either salient perception of the boat's movements, or actions directed to regulating the boat’s movement. In the discussion, we propose a distinction between three types of collective sport situations, regarding the role of the material environment of athletes in their coordination. This distinction opens new perspectives both for future research on team coordination, and for pedagogical and training implications. |
| |
| Keywords: | Enaction Team coordination Course of action Sport equipment Hydrofoil sailing |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
