Unimpaired performance during cognitive and visual manipulations in persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to healthy adults |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, 1864 Stadium Rd, P.O. Box 118205, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA;2. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Dr, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA;1. Department of Psychology, Rowan University, USA;2. Department of Family Medicine, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA;3. Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, USA;1. Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Germany;2. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia;1. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences. Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, 4059, Australia;2. National Rugby League, Sydney, Australia;1. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece;2. University of Rome ‘Foro Italico’, Italy;3. Centre for Behavioural Science & Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, UK;4. Antidoping Agency of Serbia, Serbia;5. Singidunum University, Serbia;6. Sport Psychology Lab of Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Russian Federation;7. University of Münster, Germany;8. Kingston University, UK;9. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russian Federation;10. Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland;1. School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia;2. Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | Emerging research has proposed an increased reliance on visual processing and cognitive faculties in persons following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). ACLR individuals display increased activation of visual and cognitive processing brain areas during task execution and exhibit dramatic performance decrements when vision is removed or cognitive difficulty is increased. Despite these intriguing findings, no previous studies have comprehensively assessed performance-related outcomes during tasks that challenge the cognitive and visual systems in ACLR individuals. The following hypotheses were proposed: 1) ACLR individuals will perform better on cognitive tests that required visual scanning; 2) ACLR individuals will utilize visual biofeedback when available during a proprioceptive task but experience decrements in performance when visual biofeedback is removed; and 3) during a cognitive-motor dual-task, the motor task will be more attentionally demanding for ACLR individuals compared to controls, whereas cognitive dual-task effects will be similar between groups. Twenty-one individuals with ACLR and 21 matched healthy adults performed a series of cognitive tests (Stroop, Trail Making Test, and NIH EXAMINER Battery), as well as a single-task angle-matching paradigm with and without visual biofeedback and a dual-task angle-matching paradigm with varying levels of visual and cognitive difficulty. ACLR individuals performed similarly on cognitive tasks, regardless of visual scanning requirements, demonstrated similar proprioceptive performance, evident via similar drift during the single-task conditions, and exhibited similar dual-task effects when the angle-matching paradigm was performed concurrently with a cognitive test compared to healthy adults. Despite a growing literature suggesting alterations to visual and cognitive system utilization in ACLR individuals, the current investigation found a subset of ACLR individuals do not exhibit this performance. |
| |
Keywords: | Dual-task effects Cognition Vision Proprioception ACLR |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|