Public attitudes to,and perceived impacts of 20mph (32 km/h) speed limits in Edinburgh: An exploratory study using the Speed Limits Perceptions Survey (SLiPS) |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, Room 219, Medical and Biological Sciences Building, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TF, United Kingdom;2. Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy (SCPHRP), School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, 5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh EH1 2QL, United Kingdom;3. Physical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), Institute for Sport, PE and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Moray House School of Education and Sport, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, United Kingdom;4. Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | Between 2016 and 2018 a policy was implemented to increase the proportion of 20mph (32km/h) streets in Edinburgh, UK from approximately 50% to 80%, providing the opportunity to evaluate how behaviour and public perceptions change over time. This is important as negative public responses have been reported to limit the implementation of transport policies and may reduce the effectiveness of the policy. The Speed Limits Perception Survey (SLiPS) was developed to assess changes in public perceptions from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-implementation. We collected 3,485 individual responses to the survey, 64.6% (n = 2,253) of which included complete perceptions data. Using exploratory factor analysis, the following perception factors were identified: i) Detraction and resistance, ii) Support, iii) Rule following, iv) Child safety, and v) Walking safety. Following the 20mph implementation at 6–12 months: Support (ii) and Rule following (iii) had increased; Detraction and resistance (i) had decreased; and Child safety (iv) and Walking safety (v) had not changed significantly. These findings indicate that the public in Edinburgh became more positive towards the policy once it was implemented. However, more extensive policy or ongoing communication of the safety benefits of 20mph limits are needed to increase perceptions of safety that might lead to increased walking and cycling. Future research should aim to understand how those implementing speed limit interventions can positively influence public perceptions and how public perceptions about speed limits influence behaviour. |
| |
Keywords: | Policy Transport 20mph(32km/h) Public perceptions Walking Cycling |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|