The Vices of Argument |
| |
Authors: | Andrew Aberdein |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.School of Arts and Communication,Florida Institute of Technology,Melbourne,USA |
| |
Abstract: | What should a virtue theory of argumentation say about fallacious reasoning? If good arguments are virtuous, then fallacies are vicious. Yet fallacies cannot just be identified with vices, since vices are dispositional properties of agents whereas fallacies are types of argument. Rather, if the normativity of good argumentation is explicable in terms of virtues, we should expect the wrongness of bad argumentation to be explicable in terms of vices. This approach is defended through analysis of several fallacies, with particular emphasis on the ad misericordiam. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|