首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Straw Men,Iron Men,and Argumentative Virtue
Authors:Scott F. Aikin  John P. Casey
Affiliation:1.Department of Philosophy,Vanderbilt University,Nashville,USA;2.Department of Philosophy,Northeastern Illinois University,Chicago,USA
Abstract:The straw man fallacy consists in inappropriately constructing or selecting weak (or comparatively weaker) versions of the opposition’s arguments. We will survey the three forms of straw men recognized in the literature, the straw, weak, and hollow man. We will then make the case that there are examples of inappropriately reconstructing stronger versions of the opposition’s arguments. Such cases we will call iron man fallacies. The difference between appropriate and inappropriate iron manning clarifies the limits of the virtue of open-mindedness.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号