Ten reasons why ANOVA theory and research fail to explain attribution processes: 2. Methodological problems |
| |
Authors: | R. D. Newcombe and D. R. Rutter |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Social Psychology Research Unit, University of Kent at Canterbury, Beverley Farm, Canterbury, Kent, UK |
| |
Abstract: | In this, the second of two companion papers, five major methodological problems of questionnaire research into Kelley’s ANOVA model are identified: the formulation of instructions; the choice of stimulus events; the manipulation of information variables; the choice of attribution measures; and the application of process-probing methods. It is argued that the absence of any sophisticated process propositions in Kelley’s theory, in conjunction with the five methodological problems, has led to a poverty of acceptable evidence about how people process unfolding sequences of behaviour (episodes). In conclusion, some of the process-probing methodologies of cognitive science are considered as a remedy to the naive models and methods of attribution researchers. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|