Pain-induced aggression: An ethological perspective

Pain-induced aggression has been studied mainly in animals, but generalizations are made to human aggression, noteably in Berkowitz’s “aversive-stimulation” view. This review reevaluates the motivational basis of pain-induced attack by considering it from an ethological perspective. Studies supporting the view that shock-induced attack is fear-motivated are briefly reviewed before consideration of evidence that does not support this view, from naturally-ocurring examples of pain-induced attack, and from examples of sex and hormonal effects. A reconcilliation between the apparently conflicting views is suggested by distinguishing between the functional (competitive-protective) dimension and the causal (offensive-defensive) dimension. It is proposed that pain-induced attack is protective in function but can be offensive or defensive (or both) in its form; the offensive form is only rarely observed under laboratory conditions. The implications of this view are discussed (1) for the use of shock-induced fighting as an animal model of aggression; and (2) for studies of human pain-induced aggression. Ethical issues surrounding shock-induced aggression research are considered.