首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Ethics for all: Differences across scientific society codes
Authors:Merry?Bullock  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:mbullock@apa.org"   title="  mbullock@apa.org"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Sangeeta?Panicker
Affiliation:(1) American Psychological Association, 750 First St. N.E., 20002-4242 Washington D.C., USA
Abstract:Ethics codes of a number of scientific societies across different disciplines promulgate ethical standards for responsible conduct in research and other professional activities. The content of these codes of ethics are compared on key dimensions of research, service or practice, and teaching in terms of the range and specificity of the activities these codes cover, and in the degree to which they are educational, aspirational or regulatory in purpose. The role of professional associations in educating, regulating, monitoring, and sanctioning their membership is also discussed. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the AAAS-Office of Research Integrity (ORI) meeting in Washington DC on the theme: “The Role and Activities of Scientific Societies in Promoting Research Integrity” held on April 10–11, 2000.
Keywords:ethics code  professional  research  practice  aspirational  educational
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号