首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Mindreading deception in dialog
Institution:1. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States;2. Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States;1. Fachbereich Philosophie, Universität Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany;2. Institute for Theoretical Physics, Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Universität Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland;1. The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;2. IMAPP, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;3. Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, 117218 Moscow, Russia
Abstract:This paper considers the problem of detecting deceptive agents in a conversational context. We argue that distinguishing between types of deception is required to generate successful action. This consideration motivates a novel taxonomy of deceptive and ignorant mental states, emphasizing the importance of an ulterior motive when classifying deceptive agents. After illustrating this taxonomy with a sequence of examples, we introduce a Framework for Identifying Deceptive Entities (FIDE) and demonstrate that FIDE has the representational power to distinguish between the members of our taxonomy. We conclude with some conjectures about how FIDE could be used for inference.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号