首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The effects of mental contamination on the hindsight bias: Source confusion determines success in disregarding knowledge
Authors:Melissa A. Z. Marks  Hal R. Arkes
Affiliation:1. Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA;2. Department of Psychology, Center for Health Outcomes, Policy, Evaluation Studies, Division of Health Services, Management, and Policy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Abstract:We present data from eight experiments in which we explored the effects of source confusion on the hindsight bias; participants' success in disregarding information when they were instructed to do so was affected by participants' level of source confusion. In Experiment 1 we demonstrated participants' failure to disregard Revolutionary War information they recently learned while reading an essay; this failure to discount was not affected by participants' essay reading times (Experiment 1a). In Experiment 2 participants successfully discounted obscure War of 1812 information; this discounted information remained available in memory (Experiment 2a). In a direct test of source confusion (Experiment 3) we showed that participants discriminated between presented and not‐presented War of 1812 information better than they discriminated presented and not‐presented Revolutionary War information. In Experiments 4 and 4a we tested and rejected a motivational explanation for our findings, namely that subjects voluntarily withheld information when asked to disregard it. We tested a debiasing technique in Experiment 5 and found it was successful in helping participants discount familiar information. Results throughout are discussed as being attributable to source confusion. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:hindsight bias  mental contamination  source confusion  disregarding information
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号