首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Assessing privacy invasiveness of psychological test items: Job relevant versus clinical measures of integrity
Authors:Dr. John W. Jones
Affiliation:(1) London House/Science Research Associates, 9701 W. Higgins Rd., 60018-4703 Rosemont, IL
Abstract:This pilot study was conducted to determine if clinically-oriented test items are judged to be more offensive than job-related test items. Clinical tests typically ask more personal questions while employment tests usually ask job-relevant questions. A random selection of items from three employment tests was analyzed. Two of the tests evolved from clinical-personality tests, while the third test was designed specifically for employment settings. The results suggest that if companies are interested in using employment tests that are perceived as being job-relevant, inoffensive, and non-invasive, then they should consider selecting tests that include job-relevant items as opposed to tests that are derivatives of clinical assessment instruments.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号