| 心理健康的测量:自尊量表和情感量表的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李虹.心理健康的测量:自尊量表和情感量表的比较[J].心理发展与教育,2004,20(2):75-79. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李虹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学教育研究所, 北京, 100084 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国教育科学十五规划重点课题(ABA 010012)子课题. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对两个西方常用的心理健康测量工具:Rosenberg的《自尊量表》和Bradburn的《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》进行心理测量学指标的比较。被试取自北京市三所高校的一至三年级大学生,共1142人。两个分研究的结果均表明:《自尊量表》的各项心理测量学指标都好于《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》。作为心理健康的测量工具,《自尊量表》在多数情况下比《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》更有效。
|
| 关 键 词： | 自尊量表 正性情感量表 负性情感量表 心理健康 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-4918(2004)02-0075-79 |
Assessing Psychological Well-being:Comparison between Self-esteem Scale and PAS & NAS |
| |
| LI Hong.Assessing Psychological Well-being:Comparison between Self-esteem Scale and PAS & NAS[J].Psychological Development and Education,2004,20(2):75-79. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Hong |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Education, Tsinghua University |
| |
| Abstract: | The purpose of the study was to compare the psychometric properties between two popular measures for psychological well-being:Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale and Bradburn's Positive Affect Scale (PAS) and Negative Affect Scale (NAS).The sample consisted of 1142 college students from first year to third year at three universities in Beijing.The study consisted of two different studies.Study one included 354 participants,and study two included 788 participants.Results of both studies indicated that the psychometric properties of Self-esteem Scale were better than those of PAS &NAS.Thus,the study suggested that Self-esteem Scale as a measure for psychological well-being was more appropriate than PAS & NAS. |
| |
| Keywords: | Self-esteem Scale PAS NAS Psychological Well-being |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《心理发展与教育》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《心理发展与教育》下载免费的PDF全文 |
