Eine streitlustige psychoanalytische Psychosomatik und die gegenseitige Analyse von Ferenczi und Groddeck

This article is the third part of an originally unplanned trilogy caused by the internal logic of the research process on psychosomatic theories. On the background of Freud’s difficulties with the illness and disease theory the fragmentation of the field of psychosomatic medicine has been described and presented in the two previous parts as an attempt to explain its tortuous developmental course. In the first part of this current paper the author tries to understand both the ideas and sociopolitical forces that were involved in the historical development of psychosomatic medicine. The scope of the field as well as the models used oscillated greatly. Psychoanalysis has played an important role in this development even if the mainstream psychoanalysts showed relatively little interest. Psychosomatics also required therapeutic approaches that were foreign to the accustomed psychoanalytical setting. Occasionally the influence of various physiological models was strongly displayed (e.g. Selye’s stress model and the influence of the immune system). The deepening of the psychological understanding is nevertheless due to original marginal psychoanalytic thinkers, such as Ferenczi and Groddeck. Under the influence of Ferenczi the unconventional search was completed by Balint to some extent either through development of the psychotherapeutic technique or by the influence of listening to the doctors in their interaction with patients.