首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Studies of Work: Achieving Hybrid Disciplines in IT Design and Management Studies
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">John?RookeEmail author  David?Seymour
Institution:(1) IPHRP, University of Salford, 4th Floor, Humphrey Booth House, Hulme Place, The Crescent, Salford, United Kingdom;(2) School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, UK
Abstract:We explore the relationship between ethnomethodology (EM), ethnography and the needs of managers and designers in industry, considering both ethnomethodological and industrial criteria of adequacy and explicating their relationship through the concept of “audience.” We examine a range of studies in this light, with a view to their possible candidacy as hybrid studies and identify three types of application of EM studies of work: market research, design, and business improvement. Application in the first of these fields we dub “anthropological,” in that it consists in studying and reporting back on the ways of exotic people (customers). This is the application most commonly found in studies of computer supported co-operative work (CSCW). A second CSCW application, “technomethodology,” involves the introduction of EM concepts into the design process. A further application, dubbed “holding-up-a-mirror,” involves reporting back to members of a setting upon their own activities. We argue that technomethodology and holding-up-a-mirror both offer the possibility of creating hybrid disciplines. We consider the objection that improvement and design involve the introduction of value judgements that threaten the practice of EM indifference, arguing that action research can serve as a guarantee of unique adequacy (UA) by testing the researcher’s understanding as analysis in action in the setting. Furthermore, the standard of reporting required by the UA criterion contributes to the effectiveness of proposed solutions.
Keywords:ethnomethodology  studies of work  hybrid disciplines  unique adequacy  ethnomethodological indifference  technomethodology
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号