Getting synchronized with the metronome: Comparisons between phase and period correction |
| |
Authors: | Andras Semjen Dirk Vorberg Hans-Henning Schulze |
| |
Institution: | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, CNRS-CRNC, 31, Chemin Joseph – Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France, FR Institut für Psychologie, Technische Universit?t Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, DE Fachbereich Psychologie, Philipps Universit?t Marburg, Marburg, Germany, DE
|
| |
Abstract: | Most studies of synchronization have focused on how an established phase relationship between self-produced events (e.g.,
finger taps) and the clicks of a metronome is maintained when the metronome is regular or subject to unpredictable perturbations.
Here we study how synchronization is initially established, using an experimental paradigm in which the metronome is activated
after the subject has executed a series of self-paced finger taps. In Exp. 1, the metronome period was constant and equal
to the mean of the self-paced inter-response intervals, whereas the initial phase difference of the metronome from the taps
varied across trials. The synchronization error patterns could be predicted by a linear phase correction model. Experiment
2 involved both period and phase correction. The initial phase difference was constant, whereas the metronome period varied
across trials. The observed synchronization error patterns suggest that the subjects achieved synchronization either by reacting
to the second metronome signal or by aiming at the third metronome signal. The pattern of the residual synchronization errors
was consistent with the linear phase correction model. These results support the notion that period and phase correction mechanisms
are called for by different task variables and contribute differently to sensorimotor synchronization.
Received: 20 November 1996 / Accepted: 20 April 1997 |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|