Reprint of: Working with religious and spiritual athletes: Ethical considerations for sport psychologists |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Australia;2. Cardiff School of Sport, Cardiff Metropolitan University, United Kingdom;1. School of Human Kinetics, Laurentian University, Canada;2. Hong Kong Sport Institute, Hong Kong;3. Psychology School, Beijing Sport University, China;4. Institute of Sport Psychology and Sport Pedagogy, Leipzig University, Germany;5. College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, United States;6. School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, United Kingdom;7. Division of Research & Innovation, University of Southern Queensland, Australia;1. The Swedish Sports Confederation, Skansbrogatan 7, 11860 Stockholm, Sweden;2. Halmstad University, Kristian IV:s väg 3, 30118 Halmstad, Sweden;3. FEPSAC Managing Council, Belgium;4. The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Box 5626, 11486 Stockholm, Sweden;5. School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, 125 University Private, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;6. Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Germany;7. German Research Centre of Elite Sport – Momentum, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Germany;8. National Institute of Sport, Expertise and Performance (INSEP), 11 avenue du Tremblay, 75012 Paris, France;9. English Institute of Sport, Ground Floor, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London WC1B 3HF Great Britain, UK;10. BIND-Behavioral Imaging and Neural Dynamics Center, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy;11. Department of Science and Technology, University of Suffolk, Waterfront Building, 19 Neptune Quay, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK;1. Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong;2. Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong;3. Hong Kong Sports Institute, Hong Kong;1. University of the West of Scotland, UK;2. Lancaster University, UK;1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Exercise, Health and Technology Centre, Shanghai Dongchuan Road 800, 200240 Shanghai, China;2. University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Sport Sciences, PO Box 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland;3. University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Psychology, PO Box 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland;4. KIHU – Research Institute for Olympic Sports, Jyvaskyla, Finland |
| |
| Abstract: | With a growing number of sport performers revealing their religious and spiritual beliefs, it is becoming increasingly important for sport psychologists to recognize and appreciate the values (and value systems) to which such beliefs are attached. Using the RRICC model (Plante, 2007) as a framework for discussion, and through the lens of cultural praxis, the purpose of this article is to highlight ethical issues for sport psychologists when working with religious and spiritual athletes. The RRICC model addresses the ethical principles of respect, responsibility, integrity, competence, and concern. It is hoped that a discussion of these guidelines will help sport psychologists better navigate the often challenging landscape of working with athletes whose everyday lives and identities are grounded in religious and spiritual association. |
| |
| Keywords: | Applied sport psychology Cultural praxis Ethics Religion Spirituality |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
