Valid representation of a highly dynamic collision avoidance scenario in a driving simulator |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft, Otto-Berndt-Straße 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany;2. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Fachgebiet Fahrzeugtechnik, Otto-Berndt-Straße 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany;1. Centre for Data Linkage, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia;2. Burn Injury Research Unit, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia;3. Burns Service of Western Australia, Fiona Stanley Hospital and Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia;1. Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia;2. Lead, Occupational Health and Safety Research Program, Institute of Safety, Compensation, Rehabilitation and Recovery Research, Level 11, 499 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;1. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia;2. Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia;5. Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;6. General Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia;7. Barwon Centre of Orthopaedic Research and Education (B-CORE), University Hospital Geelong, Victoria, Australia;8. School of Medicine, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia;9. Melbourne Medical School, Northern Hospital, Victoria, Australia;10. Melbourne School of Design/Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;11. Farr Institute, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, UK |
| |
Abstract: | In Germany the second-most frequent accidents in road traffic are rear-end collisions. For this reason rear-end collisions are quite important for accident research and the development of driving safety systems. To examine the functionality and to design the human–machine-interface of new driving safety systems, especially in the early development phase, subject tests are necessary. Because of the great hazard potential of such safety critical scenarios for the test persons, they are often conducted in a driving simulator (DS). Accordingly, validity is an important qualification to ensure that the findings collected in a simulated test environment can be directly transferred to the real world.This paper regards the question of driving behavior validity of DS in critical situations. There are hardly any validation studies which analyze the driving behavior in a specific collision avoidance situation.The validation study described in this paper aims to evaluate the behavioral validity of a fixed-base simulator in a collision avoidance situation. For this reason a field study from 2007 was replicated in a fixed-base simulator environment.The main questions of this validation study were if the driver can notice an active hazard braking system and if the driving behavior in a static simulator can be valid in such a critical situation.The key finding of the study states that there is no driving behavior validity in a static driving simulator for the tested dynamic scenario. The missing vestibular feedback causes a different behavior of the participants in field and simulator. The resulting absence of comparability leads to non-valid performance indicators. But these indicators are key parameters for analyzing the function and acceptance of active braking systems. So the question arises, which motion performance does a motion base have to provide in order to achieve valid acceleration simulation of such a highly dynamic collision avoidance scenario. The DS’s performance is measured in workspace, velocity and acceleration. |
| |
Keywords: | Driving simulator Validity Collision avoidance Driver behavior Wheeled mobile |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|