Equivalence class formation when responding is separated from sample and comparison stimuli: Working memory,priming, and sorting

The experiment determined whether equivalence class formation required overlap of comparison stimuli and responding. Each trial contained a sample first, a single, nonoverlapping comparison second, and a nonoverlapping response-window (RW) third, during which the participant made one of two responses (2R). All 11 participants formed two 3-member ABC equivalence classes using these “trace-stimulus-pairing two-response with response window” (TSP-2R-RW) trials. After adding a fourth stimulus (D) by CD training, ABCD tests showed immediate expansion to 4-member ABCD classes. When 4-member probes (AD, DA, BD, DB, CD, DC) were administered without 3-member probes, many participants showed decrements in class-indicative responding that then resurged to mastery with test repetition. Thus, 3-member probes enhanced class expansion. Class formation occurred for all participants when responding was temporally dissociated from the comparisons. In a matched, contemporaneously published experiment, where responding occurred during comparisons, only 54% of participants formed the classes. Thus, the comparison-response-separation nearly doubled class formation. Additionally, a special post-class-formation sorting test documented the emergence of two explicit equivalence classes. Finally, we noted a 1:1 correspondence for TSP-2R-RW and priming trials. Since priming measures neural substrates of equivalence classes, TSP-2R-RW trials should do the same.