Measurement Equivalence and Multisource Ratings for Non-managerial Positions: Recommendations for Research and Practice |
| |
| Authors: | Email author" target="_blank">James?M?DiefendorffEmail author Stanley?B?Silverman Gary?J?Greguras |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Louisiana State University, USA;(2) University of Akron, USA;(3) Singapore Management University, Singapoer;(4) The Business School, University of Colorado at Denver, Campus Box 165, P.O. Box 173364, Denver, CO, 80217-3364 |
| |
| Abstract: | ABSTRACT: The present investigation applies a comprehensive sequence of confirmatory factor analysis tests (Vandenberg and Lance, Organisational Research Methods, 3, 4–69, 2000) to the examination of the measurement equivalence of self, peer, and supervisor ratings of non-managerial targets across several performance dimensions. Results indicate a high degree of measurement equivalence across rater sources and performance dimensions. The paper illustrates how this procedure can identify very specific areas of non-equivalence and how the complexity of a multisource feedback system may be represented using such procedures. Implications of these results and recommendations for both research and practice are offered. |
| |
| Keywords: | 360 degree feedback measurement equivalence non-managerial ratings |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
