首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review,and implications for the organizational sciences
Affiliation:1. IBM, Italy;2. University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Italy;3. Center of Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94D, 14195 Berlin, Germany;4. University of Cagliari, Department of Economics and Business, V.le S.Ignazio 17, 09100 Cagliari, Italy;5. CRENoS, Italy;6. Institute of Mathematics, Ludwigsburg University of Education, Reuteallee 46D, 71634 Ludwigsburg, Germany;7. University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
Abstract:This paper reviews the advice-giving and advice-taking literature. First, the central findings from this literature are catalogued. Topics include: advice utilization, confidence, decision accuracy, and differences between advisors and decision-makers. Next, the implications of several variations of the experimental design are discussed. These variations include: the presence/absence of a pre-advice decision, the number of advisors, the amount of interaction between the decision-maker and the advisor(s) and also among advisors themselves, whether the decision-maker can choose if and when to access advice, and the type of decision-task. Several ways of measuring advice utilization are subsequently contrasted, and the conventional operationalization of “advice” itself is questioned. Finally, ways in which the advice literature can inform selected topics in the organizational sciences are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号