首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


ESSENTIALIST ARGUMENTS AGAINST DESCRIPTIVISM
Authors:MICHAEL MCGLONE
Abstract:This paper considers Kripke's (1972, 1980 ) modal arguments against descriptivism about proper names, the descriptivist reply that the meaning of a name is given by a description involving the modifier ‘actually’, and Kit Fine's (1994 ) distinction between necessary and essential attributes. It explains how Kripke's modal arguments can be recast in essentialist terms by appealing to Fine's distinction, and it argues that the resulting essentialist arguments are immune to the abovementioned descriptivist reply to the original modal arguments.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号