Clinician experiences of homework in couples and family therapy: A survey of perceived impact on the working alliance |
| |
Authors: | Nikolaos Kazantzis Frank M. Dattilio Gregg Shinkfield Alexandra M. Petrik |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Cognitive Behavior Therapy Research Unit, Melbourne, Australia;2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;3. Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, Forensicare, Fairfield, Australia;4. Cognitive Behavior Therapy Research Unit, Melbourne, Australia Department of Psychology, Counselling and Therapy, La Trobe University, La Trobe, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | The process of engaging clients in homework assignments has been studied extensively in research settings, but rarely have the challenges in the implementation of the science been considered in couples and family therapy. A survey was conducted of 226 clinicians regarding (1) their experience of homework adherence (quantity and quality) with couple and family clients, and (2) their experience of the impact of homework non-completion (IHN) on the working alliance. Clinicians working with families reported less overall homework quantity and quality. However, across both couples and family clients, more negative IHN was reported among clinicians experiencing less homework quantity, both in terms of IHN bond (couple ρ = 0.71, p < 0.001; family ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001) and IHN agreement (couples ρ = 0.25, p < 0.001; ρ = 0.19, p = 0.006), and among clinicians with fewer years of clinical experience (r = 0.19, n = 136, p < 0.05). The present findings suggest that, in the context of couples and family therapy, there is a risk of perceived negative IHN on the working alliance. There would be merit to future investigations examining the processes of facilitating homework engagement within the context of a strong working alliance. |
| |
Keywords: | Survey clinician experiences homework couple therapy family therapy working alliance |
|
|