应对行为跨文化测评的构念等同与偏差性研究

本文对COPE量表测评我国大学生应对行为方式的构念等同与偏差性进行深入探讨。采用验证性因素分析的方法测试了原版量表(COPE)及其中文修订本(C-COPE)的不同因素结构模型与465名大学生测评数据的拟合优度。研究结果支持C—COPE的测评维度结构，表明COPE量表对我国人群所进行的应对测评与西方社会的相比确实存在跨文化构念不等同性或偏差性，两者测评结果的跨文化比较因此缺乏必要前提条件。文中对所发生的构念偏差现象进行了详细分析。

Construct Equivalence and Bias in Cross-Cultural Assessment of Coping

The construct equivalence and bias of the COPE inventory in the assessment of coping styles of Chinese college students was further investigated. Different factor structure models of COPE and its revised Chinese version ( C COPE) were tested for goodness of fit by confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of college students (N=465). The current result supported the dimensionality of C COPE, which indicated that there did exist cross cultural inequivalence or bias in constructs assessed by COPE in the Chinese population as compared with that in Western society. As a consequence, it lacked prerequisites necessary for comparison of assessment results across cultures. The construct biases were analyzed in detail.