首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Delimiting the concept of research: an ethical perspective
Authors:Lisa Bortolotti  Bert Heinrichs
Institution:(1) Philosophy Department, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK;(2) German Reference Centre for Ethics in the Life Sciences (DRZE), Bonner Talweg 57, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Abstract:It is important to be able to offer an account of which activities count as scientific research, given our current interest in promoting research as a means to benefit humankind and in ethically regulating it. We attempt to offer such an account, arguing that we need to consider both the procedural and functional dimensions of an activity before we can establish whether it is a genuine instance of scientific research. By placing research in a broader schema of activities, the similarities and differences between research activities and other activities become visible. It is also easier to show why some activities that do not count as research can sometimes be confused with research and why some other activities can be regarded only partially as research. Although the concept of research is important to delimit a class of activities which we might be morally obliged to promote, we observe that the class of activities which are regarded as subject to ethical regulation is not exhausted by research activities. We argue that, whether they be research or not, all the activities that are likely to affect the rights and interests of the individuals involved and impact on the rights and interests of other individuals raise ethical issues and might be in need of ethical regulation.
Keywords:research  ethical regulation  demarcation criterion  research ethics  methodology of science  aims of science  falsification  Popper  freedom of research
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号