Letters of Recommendation: Controversy and consensus from expert perspectives |
| |
Authors: | Jessica M. Nicklin Sylvia G. Roch |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Psychology, Social Science 369, University at Albany, State University of New York 1400, Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222, USA. jn0702@albany.edu |
| |
Abstract: | Letters of recommendation (LORs) are a widely used selection tool with many issues associated with their use. To address some of these issues, 575 professionals in personnel‐related professions reported their experiences with LORs. We separated items into consensus, polarized, or neither categories. Experts reached consensus that letter inflation is a problem that may never be alleviated and that more weight is placed on letters written by someone the reader knows or from a prestigious institution or organization. Most items were polarized, suggesting substantial controversy in the field regarding LORs. Some items originally polarized reached consensus within profession (academic vs applied). Academic professionals reported using LORs more and placing more weight on their contents than applied professionals. Implications discussed include recommendations for future research and practice, such as the appropriate use of LORs, LOR formats, and training. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|