A French version of the situational self-awareness scale |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK;2. University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark;3. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749–TP 261, 21020 Ispra, VA, Italy;4. ICAAM – Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, University of Evora, Apt. 94, 7002-554 Évora, Portugal;5. CESUR, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal;6. Alterra Wageningen UR, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands;7. University of Florence, Via delle Pandette 29, 50127 Firenze, Italy;1. Theoretical Physics, CEA, Saclay, France;2. Physics Department and Center for Exploration of Energy and Matter, Indiana University, 2401 N Milo B. Sampson Lane, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA;3. RIKEN BNL Research Center, Bldg. 510A, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA;4. Institute for Nuclear Theory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1550, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveThis paper presents the findings of three studies aimed at validating a French version of the situational self-awareness scale (Govern & Marsch, 2001). The 9-item scale measures the extent to which people focus their attention on private or public aspects of themselves or on their surroundings. The scale was translated into French. The first study examined the factor structure, the second study focused on consistency and reliability, and the third study examined the convergent and discriminant validity of the scale.MethodFactor analyses were performed on data collected among 397 students. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and correlation analyses. Finally, we induced public and private self-awareness and assessed awareness to test the validity of the scale.ResultsThe results show that the scale has a three-factor structure and support the reliability of the scale over time. However, doubts remain over the construct validity of the public and private self-awareness dimensions. As expected, the data indicate that SSAS was sensitive to situational variations, in line with previous studies.DiscussionThe discussion focuses on the arguments supporting the use of the original scale and the practical implications of the scale. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
