“And yet it moves” or why grammar overrides frequency: a reply to Kempen and Harbusch |
| |
Authors: | Ina Bornkessel Matthias Schlesewsky |
| |
Affiliation: | a Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany b Junior Research Group Neurolinguistics, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | We show that Kempen and Harbusch's (Cognition (2003) this issue) arguments against our claims cannot be upheld. On the one hand, their alternative account of our data that is based on the availability of constructions with object-experiencer verbs is not compatible with the literature on the processing of these types of sentences in German. Moreover, their allegation that we failed to conduct an accurate corpus count is simply a misreading of our paper. Insofar, the commentary in no way casts doubt on our claim that grammatical regularities override frequency during online comprehension. |
| |
Keywords: | Grammar Frequency Kempen and Harbusch Sentence processing Event-related brain potentials Word order Case marking |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |