Many questions Begs the Question (but questions do not Beg the Question) |
| |
Authors: | Dale Jacquette |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Philosophy, The Pennsylvania State University, 246 Sparks Building, 16802 University Park, PA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The fallacy of many questions or the complex question, popularized by the sophism ‘Have you stopped beating your spouse?’ (when a yes-or-no answer is required), is similar to the fallacy of begging the question orpetitio principii. Douglas N. Walton inBegging the Question has recently argued that the two forms are alike in trying unfairly to elicit an admission from a dialectical opponent without meeting burden of proof, but distinct because of the circularity of question-begging argument and noncircularity of many questions. I offer a reconstruction of the many questions fallacy according to which it is just as circular as begging the question, concluding that many questions begs the question. The same analysis contradicts Walton's claim that questions can beg the question, drawing a distinction between questions as the instruments of question-begging, and as vehicles for categorical noninterrogative presuppositions that beg the question. |
| |
Keywords: | Burden of proof circular reasoning fallacy petitio principii presupposition question-begging questions Walton Douglas |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|