首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

绿激光汽化术和电切术治疗浅表性膀胱癌的比较
引用本文:潘婷,胡春宏. 绿激光汽化术和电切术治疗浅表性膀胱癌的比较[J]. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版), 2011, 32(2): 48-49
作者姓名:潘婷  胡春宏
作者单位:潘婷 (中南大学湘雅二院,湖南长沙,410011); 胡春宏 (中南大学湘雅二院,湖南长沙,410011);
摘    要:探讨经尿道选择性绿激光汽化术(PVP)治疗浅表性膀胱癌(STCC)的优点。2007年到2008年间,对病理学检查证实为浅表性膀胱癌的93例患者,采用单盲方法,分别采用经尿道电切术(TURBT)和选择性绿激光术治疗。并对术中出血、手术时间、肿瘤复发情况、膀胱穿孔例数等进行比较。结果两种手术方法手术时间、治愈率无统计学差异...

关 键 词:膀胱癌  电切术  选择性绿激光

The Comparisons on the Treatment Of Superficial Bladder Cancer in PVP And TURBT
CAO Shi-yi,CAO Zhi-xiu. The Comparisons on the Treatment Of Superficial Bladder Cancer in PVP And TURBT[J]. Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition, 2011, 32(2): 48-49
Authors:CAO Shi-yi  CAO Zhi-xiu
Affiliation:.( Department of Urology , Huangzhou Area of Huanggang , Huanggang 438000, China )
Abstract:To discuss the advantage of PVP to treat STCC, a total 93 patients, were pathological confirmed STCC, were treated with PVP and TURBT randomly. Blood loss, operative time, postoperative recurrence and vesical perforation were compared. There is no difference of operative time and recover rate between PVP and STCC(P〉0. 05). The amount of blood loss in PVP is significantly lower than that in TURBT(P〈0.01). No vesicalperforation was found in PVP. PVP has more advantages about blood loss and postoperative complication than that of TURBT during the treatment of STCC.
Keywords:bladder cancer   electrotomy   greenlight photoselective vaporization
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号