Age effects shrink when motor learning is predominantly supported by nondeclarative,automatic memory processes: Evidence from golf putting |
| |
Abstract: | Can motor learning be equivalent in younger and older adults? To address this question, 48 younger (M?=?23.5 years) and 48 older (M?=?65.0 years) participants learned to perform a golf-putting task in two different motor learning situations: one that resulted in infrequent errors or one that resulted in frequent errors. The results demonstrated that infrequent-error learning predominantly relied on nondeclarative, automatic memory processes whereas frequent-error learning predominantly relied on declarative, effortful memory processes: After learning, infrequent-error learners verbalized fewer strategies than frequent-error learners; at transfer, a concurrent, attention-demanding secondary task (tone counting) left motor performance of infrequent-error learners unaffected but impaired that of frequent-error learners. The results showed age-equivalent motor performance in infrequent-error learning but age deficits in frequent-error learning. Motor performance of frequent-error learners required more attention with age, as evidenced by an age deficit on the attention-demanding secondary task. The disappearance of age effects when nondeclarative, automatic memory processes predominated suggests that these processes are preserved with age and are available even early in motor learning. |
| |
Keywords: | Cognitive ageing Motor learning Frequency of errors Memory Attention |
|
|