Moral disagreement and procedural justice: Moral mandates as constraints to voice effects |
| |
Authors: | Christopher W Bauman Linda J Skitka |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Management and Organization, School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;2. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Procedural voice is a widely used and effective means to reduce or eliminate conflict. Moral disagreements, however, are particularly inflammatory, divisive, and difficult to manage. The current article reports two studies that demonstrated the unique challenge that moral disagreements pose. Specifically, the studies tested the extent to which procedural voice affected justice judgements, group climate, and decision acceptance when people perceived decisions to have moral implications. Results indicated that when people's outcome preferences represent strong moral convictions, outcomes were the primary determinant of perceived fairness and related judgements, irrespective of whether people had voice in the decision‐making process. |
| |
Keywords: | Moral conviction moral mandates procedural justice voice |
|
|