Argument practices |
| |
Authors: | William Keith |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Communication, Oregon State University, 97331-6199 Corvallis, OR, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The move to Postmodernism in argumentation is often predicated on the rejection of the formal basis of argument in logic. While this rejection may be justified, and is widely discussed in the literature, the loss of logic creates problems that a Postmodern theory of argument must address without recourse to logic and its attendant modernist assumptions. This essay argues that conceiving of argument in terms ofpractices will address the key problematics of Postmodernism without abandoning those features of argumentation that make it an important social, cultural and political practice. Implications for both theory and pedagogy are discussed.The author would like to acknowledge the invaluable commentary of, and discussions with, John Lyne, Charles Willard, Steven Fuller, and Ed Schiappa. |
| |
Keywords: | Argumentation rhetoric Postmodernism formal logic negotiation |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|