首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Problematic Self-Efficacy Inferences in Beginning Psychotherapy Supervisees: Identification and Management
Authors:Edward Watkins  C.  Vîşcu  Loredana-Ileana  Cădariu  Ioana-Eva  Žvelc  Maša
Affiliation:1.Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311280, Denton, TX, 76203-1280, USA
;2.Department of Psychology, Tibiscus University, Timi?oara, Romania
;3.Institute of Psychotherapy, Psychological Counselling, and Clinical Supervision, Resita, Romania
;4.Institute for Integrative Psychotherapy and Counselling, Ljubljana, Slovenia
;5.Department of Psychology, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
;
Abstract:

We contend that a particular form of self-efficacy beliefs — specifically referred to as relation-inferred self-efficacy beliefs — often gets activated in beginning supervisees, can potentially pose supervision problems from the outset and, consequently, is best addressed by supervisors early on. Relation-inferred self-efficacy beliefs refer to what supervisees think or infer that their supervisor is thinking about their therapeutic efficacy; because beginning supervisees often have doubts about their own therapeutic efficacy, they can make incorrect inferences about what their supervisor is thinking of them, and supervision can be accordingly affected. In this brief report, relation-inferred self-efficacy beliefs are elaborated upon, their significance for the trajectory of beginning supervisee development is considered, and some supervisor actions that can aid in alleviating the impact of those beliefs on beginning supervisees are identified. We view it as important that supervisors (a) hold supervisee problematic relation-inferred self-efficacy beliefs in mind as a likely supervision reality, (b) strive to proactively address their possible emergence through supervisee education at supervision’s onset and through including the topic in the body of the supervision agreement, (c) be sensitive to cues that may indicate the emergence of such problematic inferred beliefs during the course of supervision, (d) sensitively inquire about those cues and, if confirmed, be open to discussing their implications with beginning supervisees, (e) fully carry out discussion about those beliefs so as to allay supervisees’ inference concerns, and (f) because addressing those problematic beliefs is not a one-and-done affair, be ready to re-address them as need arises.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号