Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective |
| |
Authors: | Frans H. Van Eemeren Rob Grootendorst |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Instituut voor Neerlandistiek, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed that identifying and acknowledging fallacies in ordinary discussions always has a conditional character. Differences between the pragma-dialectical perspective, the Standard Treatment, and the formal logic approach to fallacy analysis are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | argument argumentation critical discussion fallacies pragma-dialectical perspective speech acts |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|