Social Value Orientation Moderates the Effects of Intuition versus Reflection on Responses to Unfair Ultimatum Offers |
| |
| Authors: | Maik Bieleke Peter M. Gollwitzer Gabriele Oettingen Urs Fischbacher |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany;2. Graduate School of Decision Sciences, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany;3. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA;4. Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany;5. Department of Economics, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany;6. Thurgau Institute of Economics, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland |
| |
| Abstract: | We investigated whether social value orientation (SVO) moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective information processing on responses to unfair offers. We measured SVO one week prior to an ultimatum game experiment in which participants had to accept or reject a series of 10 ultimatum offers including very low (unfair) ones. Before making these decisions, participants mentally contrasted their individual goals with the obstacle of pondering at length or acting in a hasty way; then they made the plan to adopt an intuitive or a reflective mode of processing (intuitive and reflective condition, respectively), or made no such plans (control condition). Participants with rather high (prosocial) SVO scores were more likely to accept unfair offers in the reflective than the intuitive condition. This effect also evinced for a subset of selfish individuals; however, the majority with rather low (selfish) scores made similar decisions in both conditions. This pattern of results suggests that SVO moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective modes of processing on responses to low ultimatum offers. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | ultimatum game social value orientation (SVO) dual‐process models fairness intuition versus reflection |
|
|
