Some unsettled problems in behavioral neuroscience research |
| |
Authors: | Email author" target="_blank">Frank?R?slerEmail author |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476 Potsdam OT Golm, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | The goal of behavioral neuroscience is to map psychological concepts onto physiological and anatomical concepts and vice versa.
The present paper reflects on some of the hidden obstacles that have to be overcome in order to find unique psychophysiological
relationships. These are, among others: (1) the different status of concepts which are defined in the two domains (ontological
subjectivity in psychology and ontological objectivity in physiology); (2) the distinct hierarchical levels to which concepts
from the two domains may belong; (3) ambiguity of concepts, because—due to limited measurement resolution or definitional
shortcomings—they sometimes do not cover unique states or processes; (4) ignored context dependencies. Moreover, it is argued
that due to the gigantic number of states and state changes, which are possible in a nervous system, it seems unlikely that
neuroscience can provide exact causal explanations and predictions of behavior. Rather, as in statistical thermodynamics the
transition from the microlevel of explanations to the macrolevel is only possible with probabilistic uncertainty. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|