Measuring Judgments of Professionals: Using Vignettes in a Social Survey About Patient Confusion |
| |
Authors: | Ruth Ludwick Richard O'Toole Anita W. O'Toole Stephen Webster |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 44242-0001;(2) Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 44242-0001 |
| |
Abstract: | The use of a factorial survey to measure the clinical judgments of professionals is described. This design allows the researcher to partial out the effects of variables on clinical decision making while using probability sampling. Methods frequently used to study judgments are reviewed and a study of nurses' judgments about patients' confusional episodes are used to illustrate the application of the factorial survey. Acute confusion in patients is a common clinical problem for nurses working in medical-surgical units in acute care hospitals. Using the factorial survey to study a real-life problem such as confusion demonstrates how this design can be used to test judgments in complex clinical situations, to aid in concept development, and to identify consensus among professionals. |
| |
Keywords: | judgment vignettes patient confusion social survey |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |