Comments on “Getting scarred and winning lotteries: Effects of exemplar cuing and statistical format on imagining low‐probability events,” By Newell,Mitchell, and Hayes (2008) |
| |
| Authors: | Jonathan J. Koehler Laura Macchi |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA;2. Sandra Day O'Conner College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA;3. Università degli Studi di Milano‐Bicocca, Milan, Italy |
| |
| Abstract: | Newell, Mitchell, and Hayes (NMH) conduct three experiments designed to test whether exemplar cuing (EC) theory or a statistical format theory provides a more accurate account for how people make judgments about low‐probability events. They report finding support for the statistical format theory and little or no support for EC. However, NMH misstate the requirements for the production of exemplars in EC theory. As a result, they confuse non‐exemplar conditions with exemplar conditions in their experiments, and find results that are virtually irrelevant to EC theory. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | exemplar cuing low‐probability events imaginability exemplars |
|
|
