首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Differences in paper-and-pencil versus computerized line bisection according to ADHD subtype and hand-use
Authors:Rolfe Mei Hsin Suzanne  Hamm Jeff P  Waldie Karen E
Institution:Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. s.rolfe@auckland.ac.nz
Abstract:Two versions of the line bisection task, paper-and-pencil and computerized, were administered to non-medicated children (5-12 years) with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Fifteen children were classified with ADHD-Inattentive type (ADHD-I), 15 were classified with ADHD-Combined or Hyperactive-Impulsive type (ADHD-C), and 15 children served as controls. During the paper-and-pencil task, and irrespective of hand-use, participants with ADHD-C bisected lines with a right bias, whereas participants with ADHD-I showed a leftwards bias. Interestingly, during the computerized version, an opposite pattern of hemineglect was observed with a leftwards bias for participants with ADHD-C and a rightwards bias for participants with ADHD-I. These findings suggest that different task demands are associated with the paper-and-pencil and computerized tasks. The findings also suggest that the two subtypes differ according to their cognitive profile, and possibly differ as to their underlying neural impairment.
Keywords:ADHD-Inattentive type  ADHD-Combined type  Dorsolateral prefrontal  Parietal  Pseudoneglect  Hemineglect
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号