| 情景判断测验的开发程序、构思效度及研究趋势 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐素萍. 情景判断测验的开发程序、构思效度及研究趋势[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(1): 119-125. DOI: |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐素萍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学管理学院，杭州 310028 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然基金项目70071050，重点项目70232010，国家“十五”教育规划重点项目 DFB010580，国家教育部博士点基金，211工程课题资助。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 章详细介绍情景判断测验开发的一般程序，对情景判断测验的多种形式和记分方法进行了总结和比较。同时，从情景判断测验的结果与认知能力、个性和工作经验等关系的角度出发，分析了情景判断测验的构思效度，认为情景判断测验测量的是多维构思。文章最后认为，需要从与其他构思的关系、测评指定构思、影响效度的因素以及跨文化比较等四个方面对情景判断测验开展进一步研究。
|
| 关 键 词： | 人事测评 情景判断测验 构思效度 认知能力。 |
| 收稿时间： | 2003-03-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-03-02 |
Situational Judgment Tests:Procedure, Validity, and Trends |
| |
| Tang Suping. Situational Judgment Tests:Procedure, Validity, and Trends[J]. Advances In Psychological Science, 2004, 12(1): 119-125. DOI: |
| |
| Authors: | Tang Suping |
| |
| Affiliation: | College of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028 |
| |
| Abstract: | We described in detail a common development procedure for situational judgment tests. Diverse formats and scoring approaches of situational judgment tests were summarized and compared. We then examined multidimensional constructs based on the facts that studies on situational judgment tests showed that situational judgment tests were correlated with cognitive ability, personality, and job experience. Directions for future research on SJT (relationships with other constructs, measuring specified construct, factors moderating validity, and cross-cultural comparison) were discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | personnel assessment situational judgment test construct validity cognitive ability. |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载全文 |
